Ambrose of Milan and the end of the Nicene-Arian conflicts

by Daniel H. Williams

This is a new and provocative study reevaluating the history of the struggle between orthodoxy and heresy in the early church. Professor Williams argues that the traditional picture of Nicene ascendancy in the western church from 350 to 381 is substantially misleading, particularly that the conventional portrait of Ambrose of Milan as one who rapidly and easily overpowered his Arian opponents is a fictional product derived from idealized accounts of the fifth century. Sources illustrating the struggle between orthodox pro-Nicenes and 'Arians', or Homoians, in the fourth century reveal that Latin Arianism was not the lifeless and theologically alien system that historians of the last century would have us believe. Professor Williams shows that the majority of churches in the west had little practical use for the Nicene Creed until the end of the 350s - over twenty five years after it was first issued under Constantine - and that the ultimate triumph of the Nicene faith was not as inevit